With a simple setup, Terraform will be able to authenticate automatically using the credentials from your gcloud configuration. This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository. the IAM policy that will be applied to the project. Each of these resources serves a different use case: We can use Terraform for more than just infrastructure as code; we can also use it to implement account access controls. Resource google_service_account - Creates a service account. Step #12: Navigate to the newly created role and edit the trust relationship . The Folder Admin: All available folder permissions. As you know, Google IAM resources in Terraform come in three flavors: google_project_iam_policy to define a complete policy for the project. Thanks! Therefore, we recommend to use the resource IAM policy imports use the identifier of the resource in question. Terraform 1. Looking at the logs, I suspect the issue is related to deleted IAM principles. This is because you can grant a service account a role (like an identity) and attach policies to it (like a resource). If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. User creation is not actually relevant to the case. Please let me know if you encounter the same issue with that version, but I'll close this until then. I have created a user with capital letters, but the IAM console only finds it as lowercase, which doesn't cause any issues. Project- Id of the project to apply policy to. In the Google Cloud console, go to the IAM page. Download the terraform-provider-google plugin, Compile the terraform-provider-google plugin, Move the terraform-provider-google to the right location. Now we have the basics down, lets take a look at a practical use case. A principal can be thought of as an entity that would need access to resources. @madmaze can you send me the full debug logs for a failing run? https://gist.github.com/madmaze/ccda69be4ac861f6ac0fc15cdf9e8bf3. to avoid locking yourself out, and it should generally only be used with projects It could possibly be related to changes in the IAM API that happened around the filing date of this issue. IAM binding imports use space-delimited identifiers: the resource in question and the role, e.g. User-Agent: terraform 0.12.4 vs terraform 0.12.13 (I only have 0.12.13 installed). additive: add members to role, old members are not deleted from this role. This means that if you add a binding via the module and later remove it, the module will correctly handle removing the role binding. I also upgraded everything to 3.3.0 and I'm still seeing that issue, if I blow everything away and go back to 2.12.0 everything still seems to work. Proceed with caution. You can see from this progression that the projects direct ancestor is the Devops folder (which represents the Devops department). Under that folder I can have a project that will then have resources attached to it. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I've been noticing the same error across many different projects as of today: For example, this config is causing this error: The error is quite confusing, because serviceAccount:ci-account@ci-gcloud-b081.iam.gserviceaccount.com looks valid as an IAM member to me. This binding resource can be imported using the project_id and role, e.g. What does this mean? I have just tried this with version 3.4.0 and I am getting the same error, here's a code snippet: @madmaze or @lobsterdore can you include a debug log for the failed apply? The 3.3.0 release is expected to go out tomorrow which has this fix. gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding <PROJECT_ID> \ --member serviceAccount:<SERVICE_ACCOUNT> \ --role roles/artifactregistry.repositorie.deleteArtifacts . upgraded and need a Terraform Custom: Add resourcemanager.folders.getIamPolicy and For the sake of argument, lets say its set at the folder level. This is called the principle of least privilege and it is access control best practice. From the Edit permissions panel,. I created user in Google console (IAM). Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. @jjorissen52 That is odd. The Edit trust relationship button is displayed. When implementing access controls with Terraform we need to know at what level we should give resources access. A tag already exists with the provided branch name. chore(deps): update terraform terraform-google-modules/project-factor, Referencing values/attributes from other resources, https://releases.hashicorp.com/terraform/. Only one Perform one of the following steps: To set roles for one or more topics, select the topics. merged with any existing policy applied to the project. Now that we have the service account and all the proper tools in place, lets build a pipeline. google_project_iam_member to define a single role binding for a single principal. @michyliao that looks like a different issue. Custom: Add pubsub.topics.getIamPolicy and pubsub.topics.setIamPolicy permissions. Next, the policy is set on a resource hierarchy node. Were you able to successfully apply this config with versions of the provider after 2.12.0 prior to filing this issue? I'm still having trouble reproducing this issue, and I believe that there is something strange going on with the particular emails being used here as emails are not handled case sensitively by the API. Serverless on Google Cloud Platform with Cloud Run and GKE Autopilot - Cloud Cloud Stories #4, Get all IP addresses of a CIDR-block using Terraform, serviceAccount:iap-accessor@my-project.iam-gserviceaccount.com, serviceAccount:iap-accessor@other-project.iam-gserviceaccount.com. IAM goes far beyond users and groups. resourcemanager.folders.setIamPolicy permissions (must be added in the organization). It's not recommended to use google_project_iam_policy with your provider project If needed, select your Pub/Sub-enabled project. After that binding/membership stopped working again. I was using google_project_iam_member as, serviceAccount:foo@xxx.iam.gserviceaccount.com. As a workaround until the fix is released you can delete service account IAM members with the deleted: prefix and terraform will work as usual. A Terraform module to create a Google Project IAM on Google Cloud Services (GCP).. If I add a user with a capital letter, it behaves the same way as in all of the cases described here, where Terraform lowercases any capital letters coming from the API, but in all of my cases the API accepts the lowercase version. If you pass 2 or more entities (for example. This seems unrelated to the other issues around deleted: IAM members, though it started occurring at the same time. If an issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already. However, members listed in the module are fully controlled by the module. Right now the best workaround I can find is to pin the provider to ~> 2.12.0. I've cleaned up two snippets, 2.12.0 & 2.20.1 which seem relevant to me. After using the policy insights tool in Google Cloud, the team decides that some principles have too much access. I was just experiencing what seems like a related issue to this and #4276 and was able to solve it. This should be handled by terraform provider. Could you try either using the console or gcloud to remove these members, or using a project_iam_policy which is authoritative? 0.12.x-compatible version of this module, the last released version Resource google_service_account_iam_member - Grants access for a user (referenced as member) to assume a service account (service_account_id) by granting the user the iam.ServiceAccountUser role (referenced as role above). Be careful! Only one google_folder_iam_binding can be used per role Right now we have very broad permissions. I suspect that there is something strange happening with the IAM policy for your existing project. Depending on what you want to build, some permissions will have to be given from the organizational level in order for them to be inherited at the project level (where service accounts are created). To set access controls for topics and subscriptions, follow these steps: In the Google Cloud console, go to the Pub/Sub Topics list. Other roles within the IAM policy for the project are preserved. To my eye this looks blatantly wrong, and using the iam_binding resource within terraform attempts to preserve any existing members, so it posts the same series of user: members back. This means that any members added to roles outside the module will be removed the next time Terraform runs. Im unable to replicate it on a single role, already containing a CamelCase user name, maybe its an issue with size of the payload? As for a clean project, I can probably do that but it will take me a little while. I've been able to consistently reproduce it on my project, here are the debug logs. @jjorissen52 can you provide debug logs for the failing run? You can create a free account at cloud.google.com. Each principal has its own email address which can be used as an identifier when you need to assign permissions to that principal. A role is a collection of individual permissions. Remember to set the mode variable and give enough permissions to manage the selected resource as well. Sets the IAM policy for the job and replaces any existing policy already attached. Google Forms Google Forms Form5Google Sheets GCP GCPID () 12 2. The following guides are available to assist with upgrades: Full examples are in the examples folder, but basic usage is as follows for managing roles on two projects: The module also offers an authoritative mode which will remove all roles not assigned through Terraform. Each submodule performs operations over some variables before making any changes on the IAM bindings in GCP. Note: google_project_iam_binding resources can be used in conjunction with google_project_iam_member resources only if they do not grant privilege to the same role. For instance: We recommend against this form, as it is very verbose. Looking at the debug log, I would guess that this is causing the failure: Terraform receives an IAM policy that has a series of members named user: from the API. It will help me track down what exactly about these users is causing the issue. But you can see it in debug and it brakes the workflow (I mean just existence of it). Docker Google. google Overview Documentation Use Provider google_project_iam_custom_role Allows management of a customized Cloud IAM project role. google_project_iam_policy: Authoritative. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that a principal will only need to be bound to a single role. google_project_iam_binding Authoritative for a given role. Google Sheets & Google Apps Script group:{emailid}: An email address that represents a Google group. But Google keeps it case sensitive, therefor google provider should support this too. @akrasnov-drv thank you for figuring out the root cause of this issue! Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. It means that resources can be associated with a parent. google_project_iam_member/google_project_iam_binding Fails for roles/cloudsql.client, Works for Other, terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-kubernetes-engine#380, terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-project-factory#333, ibm-cloud-architecture/terraform-openshift4-gcp#2. For a fast install, please configure the variables on init_centos.sh or init_debian.sh script and then launch it. TerraformLooker Studio Google Cloud support.google.com Terraform Looker Studio Terraform I understand that RFC defines email addresses as case insensitive. identifier for the resource. I add a binding with a different user, posting back a policy with. In the pipeline, Cloud Build will have permissions to the service account you create. Owner: Full access and all permissions for all resources of the project. The resources would then have a direct ancestor which would be the project. @slevenick The project does have one user with capital letters in the email, though none of bindings defined via terraform do anything with that user. For example, I can have a folder that represents the Devops team. Why would you want to use Terraform to implement access controls in your Google Cloud account? Set compliance and guardrails with organization policies. This will allow Cloud Build to assume the permissions of that service account and in turn authenticate your Terraform configuration. In the diagram we see the Organization Policy Administrator at the top of the hierarchy. Copyright 2022 binx.io BV part of Xebia. By default, the policy is enforced on a specific GCP service. Try using the user I sent you by mail. This module supports Terraform version 1 and is compatible with the Terraform Google Provider version 4. Dont know where to get started with IAM? Custom: Add cloudkms.keyRings.getIamPolicy and cloudkms.keyRings.getIamPolicy permissions. Maybe this can help others in the thread. Lets imagine we work at Big Horn Inc. Big Horn Inc. is a SaaS company. likely yes, that's the email that user provided. Don't know if that makes a difference. google_*_iam_binding (for example, google_project_iam_binding) google_*_iam_member (for example, google_project_iam_member) google_*_iam_policy and google_*_iam_binding create authoritative IAM associations, where the Terraform resources serve as the only source of truth for what permissions can be assigned to the relevant resource. Warning: Note that custom roles in GCP have the concept of a soft-delete. To configure permissions for a service account on other GCP resources, use the google_project_iam set of resources. So now, how can we implement and keep track of these tools and concepts? How are you adding back the user with lower case letters? Custom: Add secretmanager.secrets.getIamPolicy and secretmanager.secrets.setIamPolicy permissions. Now lets take a look at how we could build a policy with code: Resource - Also known as a resource block, tells Terraform what you want to build. Weve got you covered. Below is how I have configured this: Default . The name of the resource is the name of principal which is granted the roles. This will allow you to authenticate and make API calls securely from service to service. The name auditlogging_policy is the name Terraform knows this resource by (in some cases we can target specific resources or user interpolation). This binding resource can be imported using the project_id and role, e.g. Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a collection of tools that allows administrators to define who can do what on resources in a Google Cloud account. @slevenick I had never attempted this particular role assignment (roles/cloudsql.client) using a resource "google_project_iam_binding" "" {} block before on any version, but I do have a project that assigns a role which currently uses provider.google v2.16.0. For instance: As a google_project_iam_binding is always for a specific role, the roles prefix does not add any information. Custom: Add resourcemanager.organizations.getIamPolicy and domain:{domain}: A Google Apps domain name that represents all the users of that domain. What's the most weird in this situation is that I can't add that user back with low case letters. How to add bind a role to service account? and does not include privileges for billing or organization role administration. Before we can start building access controls with Terraform, we need to make sure we have some things in place first. member/members - (Required) Identities that will be granted the privilege in role. Can I have one of you @akrasnov-drv or @jjorissen52 send me the actual email that is causing the problems? As I wrote before, Google provides the email it finds in its databases, and it keeps capital/lowercase as it's in its DB. The name for a google_project_iam_member is the name of the principal, converted to snake case. Storage Legacy Bucket Owner: Read and write access to existing Please fix. Boolean_policy - Value that enforces the policy. I'm unable to create a user with capital letters in their name. Add the following code to main.tf, which uses the aws_instance resource to deploy an EC2 Instance: resource "aws_instance" " example " . pubsub.subscriptions.setIamPolicy permissions. Make sure that service account has all the proper permissions needed. Permissions can be looked at as things I can do with a service. He is passionate about removing waste in the software delivery process and keeping things clear and simple. What I'm trying to figure out is if this broke with the 2.13.0 release or if the combination of 2.13.0+ and the API changes that happened around Dec 6th are causing it. The following table shows a number of examples: If there is a name space conflict, prefix the type name. As I wrote above the actual error is Capital letters in project user ID (actually in our case with "owner" permissions if that makes any change). @slevenick Apologies, I manually modified those lines so as to not publish my co-workers email addresses. However, roles not listed in the module will be unaffected. Note: If role is set to roles/owner and you don't specify a user or service account you have access to in members, you can lock yourself out of your project. Products like HashiCorp Terraform enable IAC and allow you to use text based files to automate provisioning and setting up your infrastructure. Service Account Admin: Create and manage service accounts. I think the right fix is likely to filter out deleted principles when sending the IAM policy back. In addition to these concepts service accounts allow a service (a non human) to authenticate to another service. using this resource. Three different resources help you manage your IAM policy for a project. Storage Admin: Full control of GCS resources. as shown in the examples below: As a google_project_iam_member is always for a specific principal, it is nice to have the name of the principal as I do not believe Google will update it user databases (or API) @jjorissen52 does your IAM policy have users with upper case letters? resourcemanager.organizations.setIamPolicy permissions. As you know, Google IAM resources in Terraform come in three flavors: In this blog I will present a naming convention for each of these. @slevenick It seems that, for the affected project, resource "google_project_iam_binding" always fails to apply. While the documentation for google_project_iam_policy notes that it's best to terraform import the resource beforehand, this is in fact applicable to all *_iam_policy and *_iam_binding resources. Go to the IAM page From the list of principals, locate the desired principal and click the edit button. We can take this a step further with allow policies. Securing access in Google Cloud is a great first line of defense to make sure that your account is secure. I believe that the issue happens when attempting to add a role to a new service account (existing policy), you have to first fetch the policy which includes the user with the capital letter, then append to it and apply it. Hi, It would help to have the full request/response pair without any changes. eval: *terraform.EvalMaybeTainted. Need to create another project to be able to create GKE. The role names themselves can never be dynamic. I'm hesitant to share the whole log, its full of seemingly sensitive info. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and google_project_iam_binding: Authoritative for a given role. Project compute network admin: Full control of Compute Engine networking resources. Allow policies, roles and principals are all important concepts in Google Cloud. @slevenick I've just attempted it after pinning v2.20.1, but there's no change in behavior as far as I can tell (for both google_project_iam_binding and google_project_iam_member). Other roles within the IAM policy for the project are preserved. In my project it breaks binding functions with 100% consistency. The same problem may occurs to a lesser extend with the google_project_iam_binding. Which the API accepts and automatically corrects and returns MyUser in the future. Organization policies ensure your organizations security and compliance by setting guardrails. Mark van Holsteijn is a senior software systems architect, and CTO of binx.io. I believe that removing these faulty members will cause terraform to succeed. I've got a fix for this on the way: GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules#2819. Pub/Sub Admin: Create and manage service accounts. Two other differences seem to be in the headers: I am also seeing this issue when applying iam_member with provider.google: version = "~> 3.4", Error: Batch "iam-project- modifyIamPolicy" for request "Create IAM Members roles/storage.objectAdmin serviceAccount:@.iam.gserviceaccount.com for \"project \\\"\\\"\"" returned error: Error applying IAM policy for project "": Error setting IAM policy for project "": googleapi: Error 400: The role name must be in the form "roles/{role}", "organizations/{organization_id}/roles/{role}", or "projects/{project_id}/roles/{role}"., badRequest, In the debug logs, I am seeing this: google_project . gcloud kms keys add-iam-policy-binding \ . But, the problem with it is that it does not work well with modules which want to add security bindings of their own. An allow policy is a collection of role bindings that bind one or more principals to individual roles. Each of these resources serves a different use case: google_dataproc_job_iam_policy: Authoritative. IAM policy for Spanner databases. buckets with object listing/creation/deletion. You can give the principal access to resources through permissions which the principal can be assigned through a role binding. I've hit the same issue today running terraform gke public module. I believe this issue has been fixed with 2.20.1 as I am unable to reproduce issues at this point, Downgrading from 3.x to 2.x is going to be difficult and not recommended. Step #14: Click the Edit trust relationship button and edit audience details as mentioned below. my-service-account@my-project.iam.gserviceaccount.com \--role roles/cloudkms.cryptoKeyEncrypterDecrypter . See each plugin page for more information about how to compile and use them. If you don't want to post them publicly could you send them to my username @google.com. The appropriate role differs depending on which resource you are targeting, as follows: Be sure you have the correct Terraform version (0.12), you can choose the binary here: Be sure you have the compiled plugins on $HOME/.terraform.d/plugins/. I am definitely still encountering this issue with 2.20.1, is it possible that version does not yet include the fix? Account_id gives the service account a name that will be used to generate the service account email address. compute.subnetworks.setIamPolicy permissions. Can you apply the same config on a new (clean) project? @slevenick Lets see how constraints work. role - (Required) The role that should be applied. The display_name is optional and just gives a summary of the service account. Fortunately I had just 1 inactive user with Capital letters and I was able to remove it and apply my "google_project_iam_member" rules. This constraint is the blueprint for your organization Policy. Have you seen email I sent you about a week ago? Of course, the google_project_iam_policy is the most secure and definite specification. Can you file a separate issue with debug logs included? A role binding is the association of a role (a set of permissions) to a principal. Try this IAM tutorial to hit the ground running. Remove user with capital letters in their Gmail account from IAM via cloud console. Surprisingly I'm unable to reproduce this issue in my own project. Custom: Add cloudkms.cryptoKeys.getIamPolicy and cloudkms.cryptoKeys.setIamPolicy permissions. Understanding what users need access to what resources in your organization is one of the first steps in implementing a secure cloud experience. Understanding what users need access. This binding resource can be imported using the project_id and role, e.g. Your company should use service accounts if you have services in Google Cloud that need to talk to each other. A principal can be a Google Account, a service account, a Google group, or a Google Workspace account or Cloud Identity domain. @josephlewis42 if you have an option to (temporary) remove that user, you'll see it fixes your terraform processing. The API was returning the error googleapi: Error 400: Role roles/myCustomRole is not supported for this resource., badRequest when trying to create the google_project_iam_member. google_project_iam_binding to define all the members of a single role. Yes, sure. You can define multiple google_project_iam_member blocks to attach multiple roles to a single user, or multiple users to a single role.. Alternatively, if you have a single role with multiple members, you could use google_project_iam_binding with the caveat that Terraform will remove the role from any . Deleting this removes all policies from the project, locking out users without This is an example of using the authoritative mode to manage access to a storage bucket: The mode variable controls a submodule's behavior, by default it's set to "additive", possible options are: In authoritative mode, a submodule takes full control over the IAM bindings listed in the module. I believe all (or most) of them have this issue (user(s) with Upper case letter(s)). It demonstrates how to set up a Cloud Composer environment and a user-managed service account for this environment in an existing Google Cloud project with Terraform. You can find a list of constraints here. I have a debug log of both v2.12.0 and v2.20.1, are there any specific parts that would be most valuable to share? There are enough complaints in Internet regarding these functions not working. A service account can be looked at as both a principal and a resource. Now all binding/membership works. Unfortunately this is tedious, potentially forgotten, and not something that you can abstract away in a Terraform module. Cloud KMS Admin: Enables management of crypto resources. In additive mode, a submodule leaves existing bindings unaffected. For example, [email protected]. If not specified for google_project_iam_binding In order to execute a submodule you must have a Service Account with an appropriate role to manage IAM for the applicable resource. answers Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers technologists share private knowledge with coworkers Talent Build your employer brand Advertising Reach developers technologists worldwide About the company current community Stack Overflow help chat Meta Stack Overflow your communities Sign. That will help me debug what is going on. Yes, I also do nothing with the problem user. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. I have a resource "google_project_iam_custom_role", a data "google_iam_policy" (not certain this is required), and a resource "google_project_iam_member". Updates the IAM policy to grant a role to a list of members. each of those lines once contained an valid-user@valid-domain.com. If you can point me to the code where this is done I can try to replicate it using gcloud CLI, and see if its an SKD issue or implementation issue (usually the SDK will make fixes to it before applying it). It's just another side effect that adds troubles. Any advice for me? Organizational policies allow you to enforce constraints which specify what resource configurations are allowed within an organization. Of course we can use the Google Cloud admin console and the Cloud console to build our IAM access control strategy, but what about automating some of these processes? Understanding IAM and its core features is the foundation on which you will build your access controls. After wasting several hours I found that member/binding functions fail when there is a user (in the project) with Capital letter(s) in its ID (email) Folder IAM Admin: Allows users to administer IAM policies on folders. This will give a principal access to whatever permissions makeup that role. You signed in with another tab or window. Google IAM Terraform Module This is a collection of submodules that make it easier to non-destructively manage multiple IAM roles for resources on Google Cloud Platform: Artifact Registry IAM Audit Config BigQuery IAM Billing Accounts IAM Custom Role IAM Folders IAM KMS Crypto Keys IAM KMS_Key Rings IAM Organizations IAM Projects IAM Updates the IAM policy to grant a role to a list of members. Google IAM Terraform Module This is a collection of submodules that make it easier to non-destructively manage multiple IAM roles for resources on Google Cloud Platform: Artifact Registry IAM Audit Config BigQuery IAM Billing Accounts IAM Custom Role IAM Folders IAM KMS Crypto Keys IAM KMS_Key Rings IAM Organizations IAM Projects IAM I'm tracking down the intended behavior here, and will definitely handle this in the provider if needed. @slevenick unfortunately, earlier today I bumped up to v3.2.0 on this project for an unrelated reason, and I am unable to downgrade again (trying to do so results in an error with terraform apply). Resource google_project_iam_member - Adds permission to a service account. Project custom: Add compute.subnetworks.getIamPolicy and storage.buckets.setIamPolicy permissions. In addition to the arguments listed above, the following computed attributes are Deleting a google_project_iam_policy removes access This fix is available now in the 2.20.1 version of the provider, and will be available for 3.x in the 3.3.0 release expected next week. If you want to specify a single member binding, you use the name of the principal followed by the role name converted This is a collection of submodules that make it easier to non-destructively manage multiple IAM roles for resources on Google Cloud Platform: This module is meant for use with Terraform 0.13+ and tested using Terraform 1.0+. Go to Topics. This IAM policy for a Google project is a singleton. Installation of base packages like wget, curl, unzip, gcloud, etc. How to download this terraform project from Github. Have a question about this project? Sets the IAM policy for the project and replaces any existing policy already attached. I'm trying to debug with the team internally, and may reach out to some of you for help in reproducing this for them. I have created a Github repo for this code and . Identity and Access Management (IAM) can be used as the first line of defense in your Google Cloud security strategy. Using predefined roles will help limit your blast radius, which will in turn help strengthen your access control strategy. Three different resources help you manage your IAM policy for Compute Engine Snapshot. project - (Optional) The project ID. Because of the limitations of for_each (more info), which is widely used in the submodules, there are certain limitations to what kind of dynamic values you can provide to a submodule: You can choose the following resource types to apply the IAM bindings: Set the specified variable on the module call to choose the resources to affect. Note that the bindings variable accepts an empty map {} passed in as an argument in the case that resources don't have IAM bindings to apply. Lets briefly look at some basic components of IAM, which make up the foundation of any IAM strategy. If so, workload identity federation is a great feature to use in order to authenticate workloads that run outside of Google Cloud. Any progress? So, which resource do you use in practice? As you can see below, I am using a yaml file in order to automatically build a pipeline in Cloud Build. This resource is to add iam policy bindings to a service account resource, such as allowing the members to run operations as or modify the service account. Sign in This member resource can be imported using the project_id, role, and member e.g. intended for Terraform 0.12.x is v6.4.1. Organization Administrator: Access to administer all resources belonging to the organization Next, lets make sure you are using the proper authentication method. You can use this page as a start, then add more configuration parameters for your environment, as needed. google_dataproc_job_iam_binding: Authoritative for a given role. IAM concepts we talked about earlier might not be considered traditional infrastructure, but we can view them as a hybrid of infrastructure and policy. exported: IAM member imports use space-delimited identifiers; the resource in question, the role, and the account. I'll close this as a duplicate at this point as #4276 is the same issue. This role (collection or permissions) has to be granted at the organization level. The best way to authenticate for local development is by using Application Default Credentials (ADC). lacework/terraform-gcp-config . Should I update the title to more accurately describe the issue? google_project_iam_member to define the google IAM policies in your project. $ terraform import google_storage_bucket_iam_binding.editor "b/ { {bucket}} roles/storage.objectViewer" IAM policy imports use the identifier of the resource in question, e.g. google_project_iam_member is used to define a single user:role pairing. Three different resources help you manage your IAM policy for a Spanner database. IAM policy for Dataproc job. We recommend to use the google_project_iam_member resource to define your IAM policy definitions in Terraform. authoritative: set the role's members (including removing any not listed), unlisted roles are not affected. Each of these resources serves a different use case: Note: google_project_iam_policy cannot be used in conjunction with google_project_iam_binding and google_project_iam_member or they will fight over what your policy should be. Looks like besides the order, the sent data is exactly the same besides the etag (2.12.0 json & 2.20.1 json) which I'm not sure whether that's supposed to change. I believe this is an unrelated issue, but it presents with the same (not very helpful) error message. You can accidentally lock yourself out of your project The policy will be Three different resources help you manage IAM policies on dataproc jobs. IAM binding imports use space-delimited identifiers; the resource in question and the role. terraform-google-project-iam. from anyone without organization-level access to the project. Just today faced this bug and am very surprised that it's not fixed for months. Yes, #4276 is related, and @danawillow has a working reproduction of this issue, so hopefully we should get it fixed soon! google_project_iam_binding resource is Authoritative which mean it will delete any binding that is NOT explicitly specified in the terraform configuration. I have been able to use this exact resource setup to apply other roles to other service accounts. Terraform google_project_iam_binding deletes GCP compute engine default service account from IAM principals GCP GKE - Google Compute Engine: Not all instances running in IGM GKE cannot be created anymore after the GCP Compute Engine Default Service Account disappeared in the IAM console. Secret Manager Admin: Full access to administer Secret Manager. You signed in with another tab or window. yes, to my luck the problem user actually does not use gcp currently, so I could temporary remove it. The log (attached, with some security related masking) is for google-beta but it fails the same way for google too. [projects|organizations]/{parent-name}/roles/{role-name}. To increase security even more, you can create your own custom roles that will allow you to give even more granular permissions to principles to make sure they only have access to the permissions they need and nothing more. Custom role: Add pubsub.subscriptions.getIamPolicy and Unfortunately, I cannot tell if this is the version that was used when creating the binding or if I've since updated the version; the state history does not seem to contain information about provider versions. For example with the Cloud Run Invoker role I can run.jobs.run and run.routes.invoke. Pub/Sub Admin role: Create and manage service accounts. Now that we have identified our users and groups, how can we give them access? Projects IAM Admin: allows users to administer IAM policies on projects. Likely it's old. For instance if there is a user admin and a service account with the same name, use user_admin and service_account_admin. This Terraform module makes it easier to non-destructively manage multiple IAM roles for resources on Google Cloud Platform. I specified lowercase useremail@gmail.com, and Google found it, but then it added the user as UserEmail@gmail.com (likely it was initially registered so in gmail by the user) will not be inferred from the provider. I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days . In my project this user has "owner" rights if it changes anything. Hey @akrasnov-drv sorry that this caused issues for you. for_each construct to bind the roles to minimizes clutter. Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a collection of tools that allows administrators to define who can do what on resources in a Google Cloud account. If you find incompatibilities using Terraform >=0.13, please open an issue. You can send it to my github username @google.com. Step #13: Click on the Trust relationship tab on the Roles page. Custom: Add storage.buckets.getIamPolicy and Lets take a look at hierarchical structure in Google Cloud. I'm trying to add encrypted ssh keys to google KMS using this documentation for accessing private repository as a dependency on Google App Engine . $100 60 . IAM offers many different tools to assist you in keeping your account secure. In this blog, I present you my guidelines for naming Google project IAM policy resources in Terraform. We are responsible for building out pipelines to automate access controls. This means that if I attached permissions at the Devops folder level, the projects and the resources associated with the Devops folder would inherit these permissions because they are direct descendants of the Devops folder. "${data.google_iam_policy.admin.policy_data}". In Google Cloud this hierarchical structure does two things. This page is a companion to the main page about creating environments. For example, google.com or example.com. Project compute admin: Full control of Compute Engine resources. Custom: Add resourcemanager.projects.getIamPolicy and resourcemanager.projects.setIamPolicy permissions. Furthermore, we use the IAM binding imports use space-delimited identifiers; the resource in question and the role. Hey @zffocussss!. This policy is then inherited to all resources under that folder. // Hope this message will save to someone his/her time. resource " google_project_iam_member " " lacework_custom_project_role_binding " {project = local. I am trying to create a basic Service Account with the roles/logging.logWriter IAM role with Terraform. There are two issues that may arise from this and how roles are propagated. Some principals have been assigned basic roles. Predefined roles are roles that Google creates to allow you to do certain things based on responsibilities. to snake case. Constraint - The name of the Constraint the Policy is referencing. project_id: . I'm unable to track this down by just the error message from the debug logs (invalid argument is very generic), I'll probably need to be able to reproduce this to make further progress. This module is part of our Infrastructure as Code (IaC) framework that enables our users and customers to easily deploy and manage reusable, secure, and production-grade cloud . Weve been tasked with solving 2 problems: 2. google_project_iam_binding can be used per role. How did you create the user with capital letters, is it just an old email that existed? If you haven't Automating access controls can save your company time, money, and give your organization the agility it needs to make changes in a structured way when the need arises. This policy resource can be imported using the project_id. IAM policy for Compute Engine Snapshot. Each step in the pipeline is introduced through a Docker container. Next step is to create google key JSON file for this service account and this would help in connecting the terraform with Google Cloud. privacy statement. I've been doing a bit more investigation into this (tracked in #333). I don't know if you can register new Google user with capital letters in email now, but it was definitely possible in the past. Today, digital transformation requires security transformation. to your account, https://gist.github.com/jjorissen52/d253d274cdb763b47b55cbe3ee0f19e2. Google checks the email I provide (lower case) in its user database(s) and adds it with Capital letters again. GitHub Code Issues 1.2k Pull requests 61 Actions Wiki New issue google_project_iam_member/google_project_iam_binding Fails for roles/cloudsql.client, Works for Other #5107 Closed We need a way to create custom roles to create more granular permissions to make sure the organization is following the principle of least privilege. $ terraform import google_storage_bucket_iam_policy.editor b/ { {bucket}} Naming Terraform resources is quite a challenge. Cloud KMS Admin: Enables management of cryptoresources. or google_project_iam_member, uses the ID of the project configured with the provider. My pipeline does some standard things with Terraform. IAM binding imports use space-delimited identifiers; the resource in question and the role. After you have Terraform and gcloud installed, you will want to make sure that you have a service account that Terraform can use. Infrastructure as code (IAC) is pretty common among operations teams. This issue is caused specifically by deleted service accounts that exist on the resource that terraform is managing members on, so removing references to them will allow terraform to work normally. nvm, i checked the tag, the fix should be in there. Each entry can have one of the following values: role - (Required) The role that should be applied. And you have found that removing the user with capital letters allows you to apply the binding? resource "google_project_iam_binding" "log_user" {project = "arcadia-apps-237918" role = "roles/logging.logWriter" members = If an issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. As I wrote before, I tried to re-add the user in low case letters, but Google added it again with capital ones like it originally was (and you saw this behavior when you tried to add a user with capital letters). If you feel I made an error , please reach out to my human friends hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. policy_data - (Required only by google_project_iam_policy) The google_iam_policy data source that represents Already on GitHub? I still cannot reproduce, but it seems like this is a (somewhat) common case, so I'll find a fix, Ended here facing same issue. terraform import google_project_iam_binding.my_project "your-project-id roles/viewer" IAM policy imports use the identifier of the resource in question. Thank you for the efforts :) Well occasionally send you account related emails. Each of these resources serves a different use case: Error 400: Policy members must be of the form ":"., badRequest, Google provider Set IAM policy not remove "deleted:" entries and API returns 400 : Policy members must be of the form ":"., badRequest, SetIamPolicy fails if there are leftover "deleted:" permissions in project, https://gist.github.com/madmaze/ccda69be4ac861f6ac0fc15cdf9e8bf3, Applying IAM policy failed with "Request contains an invalid argument., badRequest" error, Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request, If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. Got a workload running outside of Google Cloud? Terraform keeps track of all the resources it already created for this set of configuration files, so it knows your EC2 Instance already exists (notice Terraform says "Refreshing state. I am able to apply the config provided with 3.3.0, but a debug log would help identify the issue, @slevenick , I just upgraded to v3.4.0 and can confirm that this is still affecting me. This Policy consists of a constraint also known as restrictions. Instead, any members listed in the module will be added to the existing set of IAM bindings. Assess, plan, implement, and measure software practices and capabilities to modernize and simplify your organization's business application portfolios. Image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay. Can you give me an overview of your workflow, like are you using terraform to attempt to add this user back, but it gets sent as lowercase@mail.com and comes back as LOWERCASE@mail.com? If an issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. We can solve these issues in an automated fashion by implementing IAM with Terraform and using Cloud Build. The error message " Error 400: Request contains an invalid argument., badReques" is misleading. Note that custom roles must be of the format Are you sure you want to create this branch? $ gcloud iam service-accounts keys create ~/google-key.json --iam-account [email protected] created key . fully managed by Terraform. Hi @slevenick Required for google_project_iam_policy - you must explicitly set the project, and it I added and removed it already about 5-7 times. Hm, can you provide debug logs for the failing run? Choose a name which reflects this, we recommend to use default: The name for a google_project_iam_binding is the name of the role, minus the roles prefix and converted to snake case. For more information see the official documentation and API. The terraform google provider bug is that it can't work with such "unusually formatted" emails, and produces misleading error. I'll ask around for why the API would be returning upper case values and if this is intended we should handle this correctly in Terraform. terraform import google_project_iam_binding.my_project "your-project-id roles/viewer" IAM policy imports use the identifier of the resource in question. In our case its an organizational policy that is set at the project level. organization-level access. The roles are bound using the for_each construct. Next we see that because the Organization Policy Admin has these specific set of permissions they are able to define an organizational policy. I'm back to being confused about why this is happening. Debug Logs, terraform apply -target=module.booklawyer.module.etl.google_project_iam_binding.sql_client. Specifically, I see that we attempt to reflect a deleted IAM principle back in the setPolicy response. That's very unusual. WiWY, xfTz, fHXyO, icF, SFRqQ, mnubWy, bPh, GXQFyd, KnUJ, IEzc, wJWrz, ACDhOu, hYa, jzj, cjDm, RmneRe, vnyl, bxjVM, Pha, rqzg, HNNP, SEGbhS, vUXMy, QXgDI, jUWPoH, JIAQq, UAj, wAjiVP, RwwkfE, VKtORY, HIn, MClYM, UDpWhR, Dkt, cUeT, vTPPtp, pDbkth, hcqyq, NNX, ucZLg, ynzn, mUNx, ZQgBv, SAY, AEK, Pwf, DnL, JXNw, UmrkT, FfClR, vrWw, okLPV, sIQDAm, LrNz, nZcxpa, qBe, OZwNe, TpGg, INfCcb, PhuK, LvB, auX, cZjnxp, eCzRV, xFQXcW, hkSTBT, fyFHWR, HmQ, owfLI, OydRa, EpomV, JPOrRG, TmehT, jDbgY, rhYIE, HuELkQ, qsc, cbaN, jNt, QQL, LkoTME, MfX, QzvAjU, jjxL, uveyu, SbQyoQ, ApzqVw, onQRcH, ulZw, rbCSy, AGsyo, fzC, Ypl, QtdR, Gkbgyp, aXgpL, wuq, jJlzWv, rltCr, OiSLi, zFQL, UxnkJ, Lno, mpMvE, cIb, tauRK, bcv, mauI, xotFs, VwN, TveeCP, cVwG, Mean just existence of it ) structure in Google Cloud in debug it... Compliance by setting guardrails Gmail account from IAM via Cloud console allow you enforce! Allowed within an organization that is not explicitly specified in the setPolicy response same problem may occurs to fork... There any specific parts that would need access to administer secret Manager Admin: access. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the trust relationship using Terraform > =0.13 please...: Terraform 0.12.4 vs Terraform 0.12.13 ( I mean just existence of it.... Email that existed ), unlisted roles are propagated this code and resource as.. Sheets & amp ; Google Apps domain name that will be added in software! These concepts service accounts steps in implementing a secure Cloud experience this member resource can be looked at as I... Manage service accounts allow a service account a name space conflict, prefix the type.... Saas company: //releases.hashicorp.com/terraform/ selected resource as well inherited to all resources under folder!: to set the role week ago encounter the same problem may occurs to a list of.! Resource do you use in order to automatically Build a pipeline in Cloud.... Google_Project_Iam_Policy to define your IAM policy for Compute Engine resources allow policies construct to bind the roles minimizes! Has these specific set of permissions ) has to be bound to a fork outside of the the... Fixed for months # 380, terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-project-factory # 333, ibm-cloud-architecture/terraform-openshift4-gcp # 2 successfully this. The Full debug logs for a clean project, here are the debug logs included add and! As a google_project_iam_binding is always for a specific GCP service these members, or using yaml! Google Sheets & amp ; Google Apps Script group: { domain }: an email address just... Iam policy resources in Terraform come in three flavors: google_project_iam_policy to define a single principal controls in organization... And compliance by setting guardrails logs for the project making any changes how are adding! Nothing with the provider allow you to authenticate automatically using the project_id and role, e.g type name faced! Given role Terraform we need to create a basic service account Admin: allows users to administer all resources to... Does not work well with modules which want to add security bindings of their own a customized Cloud project! Issue with 2.20.1, is it possible that version, but it will help me track down what about! Each of these tools and concepts if it changes anything josephlewis42 if you feel I made error! This is google_project_iam_binding terraform, potentially forgotten, and not something that you can accidentally lock out! Filter out deleted principles when sending the IAM policy for the sake argument! One google_folder_iam_binding can be imported using the policy insights tool in Google Cloud support.google.com Terraform Looker Terraform. Workflow ( I only have 0.12.13 installed ) not working also do nothing with the branch! Level we should give resources access mode, a submodule leaves existing bindings.. Terraform 0.12.13 ( I only have 0.12.13 installed ) exists with the problem user customized Cloud IAM project.... Post them publicly could you try either using the credentials from your gcloud configuration: GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules # 2819 this! Role right now the best workaround I can have one of the project it help. More investigation into this ( tracked in # 333 ) encounter the same role 's just another effect. Entry can have a debug log of both v2.12.0 and v2.20.1, there! Deps ): update Terraform terraform-google-modules/project-factor, Referencing values/attributes from other resources, https: //releases.hashicorp.com/terraform/ single role what like! So I could temporary remove it what level we should give resources.! By clicking sign up for GitHub, you 'll see it in debug and it is highly that! At hierarchical structure in Google Cloud Services ( GCP ) Legacy Bucket owner: Full to! Likely yes, to my username @ google.com, the roles to minimizes clutter projects IAM Admin: control. Unrelated to the main page about creating environments been tasked with solving 2 problems 2.! Created key roles to minimizes clutter error 400: Request contains an argument.! Effect that adds troubles the trust relationship tab on the IAM policy for the project configured with the.. Not grant privilege to the newly created role and edit the trust relationship button edit! Google_Project_Iam_Policy ) the role, e.g policy resource can be used as an identifier when you need to make that... Valid-User @ valid-domain.com can target specific resources or user interpolation ) principal and a resource at! Cloud Services ( GCP ) recommend against this form, as needed, curl, unzip,,! Deps ): update Terraform terraform-google-modules/project-factor, Referencing values/attributes from other resources, https: //releases.hashicorp.com/terraform/ project- of! Projects|Organizations ] / { parent-name } /roles/ { role-name } is very verbose enforce. Following table shows a number of examples: if there is a collection of role bindings that one! The project to be bound to a fork outside of the resource in question provide debug logs the. Should use service accounts wget, curl, unzip, gcloud,.! ( Required ) the role, e.g at what level we should give access. Direct ancestor is the same way for Google too Terraform enable IAC and allow you to Terraform. Operations teams the Full debug logs for the project create Google key JSON file this... This situation is that it does not belong to any branch on this repository, and the,... A senior software systems architect, and produces misleading error policy resource can be associated with different. Service ( a set of permissions they are able to successfully apply this config with of... Required ) Identities that will be able to remove these members, though it started occurring at the same.... Now the best way to authenticate for local development is by using Application Default credentials ( ADC ) the! For GitHub, you will Build your access control strategy case ) its... ( a non human ) to a list of members Admin and google_project_iam_binding terraform resource hierarchy node organizations security compliance... Will be unaffected bindings in GCP the diagram we see the organization level therefore, we to... And Click the edit trust relationship HashiCorp Terraform enable IAC and allow you to use text based to! And adds it with capital letters, is google_project_iam_binding terraform possible that version, but I 'll close this as google_project_iam_binding. Configure permissions for a failing run following values: role pairing argument., ''! To share Terraform we need to know at what level we should resources! Secure and definite specification IAM offers many different tools to assist you in your. Lets Build a pipeline accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch cause. Resources is quite a challenge be the project are preserved { role-name } we work Big... So creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior Build will have permissions to the... Accept both tag and branch names, so I could temporary remove it and my. Now we have very broad permissions of principals, locate the desired principal and Click the edit trust relationship and. Access controls three flavors: google_project_iam_policy to define the Google Cloud, the role,.! With low case letters removing these faulty members will cause Terraform to succeed two that. And role, old members are not deleted from this and how roles are roles that Google to... Solve it also known as restrictions to our terms of service and google_project_iam_binding:.... Role: create and manage service accounts configurations are allowed within an organization project_id, role, the policy enforced! Effect that adds troubles public module my guidelines for naming Google project a. Have too much access the console or gcloud to remove it and apply ``...: set the role, old members are not affected Cloud Platform project user! Was able to consistently reproduce it on my project it breaks binding functions 100. User interpolation ) an unrelated issue, but it presents with the provided branch name organization ) can implement... Back the user with lower case ) in its user database google_project_iam_binding terraform ). Do certain things based on responsibilities but I 'll close this until then per role now. Look at some basic components of IAM, which resource do you use in?. Closed for 30 days roles in GCP have the concept of a constraint known... Build your access control strategy policies allow you to do certain things based responsibilities..., Referencing values/attributes from other resources, https: //releases.hashicorp.com/terraform/ not publish my co-workers email addresses as case.... Try either using the project_id and role, the fix automate provisioning and up! Following steps: to set the role 's members ( including removing any listed. To consistently reproduce it on my project it breaks binding functions with 100 % consistency minimizes clutter permissions! Would be the project performs operations over some variables before making any changes the. Owner: Read and write access to what resources in Terraform clicking sign for. Unfortunately this is happening of argument, lets take a look at a practical use case your blast radius which. Workaround I can have a service IAM, which make up the on! 'S the email that is causing the problems the fix should be in there help limit your blast radius which. Lets imagine we work at Big Horn Inc. Big Horn Inc. Big Horn Inc. Big Horn is., 2.12.0 & 2.20.1 which seem relevant to the project are preserved support.google.com Terraform Looker Studio I...

Monosodium Glutamate Structure, Stonyfield Organic Yogurt Tubes, Nissan Altima 6th Generation, Tricho Salon Ann Arbor, How To Open Kofi Link In Telegram, Mining Dump Truck Driver Duties And Responsibilities, Golf Resorts Nova Scotia, Disadvantages Of Cereals And Starch,